There's Just No Rest
For the Retired Investor
By JONATHAN
CLEMENTS
Retirees often write to me, complaining that there aren't enough
articles devoted to the issues they face. And they're right.
Investing in retirement? Who cares about that? Most of us ink-stained
wretches are years from retirement, so the subject doesn't much interest
us.
But there's another reason for this neglect by personal finance writers.
Investing in retirement is so tricky that it just doesn't lend itself to
journalistic generalizations.
The fact is, once you give up that paycheck, your everyday life may be a
lot more fun, but your financial life becomes infinitely more complicated.
Here are just some of the uncertainties that retirees face:
Living Long
If you are saving for retirement or your kid's college education, you
have a pretty good idea of what your time horizon is. By contrast, once you
retire, you don't know whether you need to make your money last a few years
or a few decades.
For proof, consider some statistics from William Huff, an actuary with
Seattle's Safeco Corp. Mr. Huff looked at
the life expectancy for folks age 65.
He threw out the extremes, the 10% of 65 year olds who will die the most
quickly and the 10% who will live the longest, leaving only the middle 80%.
Even then, the range was huge. Men in this middle 80% might live as little
as seven years or as long as 32 years. For women, the range was 10 to 33
years.
Clearly, how you manage your finances will vary enormously, depending on
where in that range you think you will fall. As you try to get a handle on
your life expectancy, consider your health, family longevity and whether
you smoke.
Such factors are built into an intriguing quiz that is available at
www.livingto100.com. But no matter what life expectancy the Web site suggests for you,
you should plan for a somewhat longer retirement, just in case the doctors
and the actuaries turn out to be wrong.
Rising Costs
The dollar's spending power was slashed by 51% in the 1970s, 39% in the
1980s and 25% in the 1990s, according to Chicago's Ibbotson Associates. In
other words, even in the low inflation 1990s, folks living off a fixed
income would have seen their standard of living cut by a quarter.
Moreover, older Americans were hit even harder than the statistics
suggest. "Retirees have a much higher inflation rate than the general
population, largely because of medical costs," says Henry Hebeler, a
retired engineer and author of "J.K. Lasser's Your Winning Retirement
Plan." "My wife and I visit widows in their 70s and 80s who spend over
$1,000 a month on prescription drugs."
The implication: As you confront the prospect of spending 20 years or
more in retirement, you can't simply plunk your savings in bonds or
certificates of deposit and then spend all the interest.
Instead, you need to ensure that your portfolio continues to grow in the
first 10 or 15 years of retirement, thus partly offsetting the corrosive
impact of inflation. That means not only reinvesting a sliver of the
interest from your CDs and bonds back into your portfolio, but also
stashing maybe half your money in stocks.
Performance Perils
Fending off inflation is a lot easier if the markets are kind. On that
score, the 18 years through year end 1999 were a bonanza for retirees. The
Standard & Poor's 500 stock index clocked 18.5% a year and long term
government bonds garnered 12.1%, while inflation shuffled along at 3.3%
annually.
But the prior 16 years, through year end 1981, weren't nearly so
generous. According to Ibbotson, the S&P 500 gained just 5.9% a year
and long term government bonds returned 2.5%, less than the 7% inflation
rate.
Will today's retirees get lucky or unlucky? With long term government
bonds yielding less than 6% and stocks still at nosebleed valuations, my
hunch is that the decade ahead will deliver lackluster returns.
But even if the next 10 years eventually offer up healthy gains, you
need to pay attention to the "sequence of returns." This is especially
critical in the first few years after you quit the work force.
Suppose you retire and immediately get hit with a vicious bear market.
If you are not careful, the combination of market losses and your own
withdrawals could devastate your portfolio.
Indeed, even if the market later rebounds strongly and fares well
through the rest of your retirement, you may still find yourself pinching
pennies. The reason: Your portfolio was so depleted in those initial years
that you don't benefit much from the subsequent strong returns.
Self-Inflicted Wounds
You can't control how the market performs. But you can limit the damage
done, by investing and spending prudently.
No matter what your age, you will likely get in a heap of financial
trouble if you roll the dice on risky stocks, rack up hefty investment
costs, hire an unscrupulous financial adviser or spend too much. But such
missteps are especially devastating once you quit the work force, because
you can't use your next paycheck to paper over your mistakes.
"We live in a golf course community, and you see people dropping their
membership all the time," Mr. Hebeler says. "People often overspend in
their early retirement years, and then they have to cut back."
|